Borisoglebsk

Serhiy Cherevaty, the spokesperson for the Eastern Group of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, sheds light on the dangerous Russian weapons that are a priority on their target list. Quick destruction of these weapons is crucial, as they wield a significant influence on the efficiency of the Ukrainian units.

According to Cherevaty, Ukraine’s defenders are perpetually on the hunt for Russia’s electronic warfare systems. Weapons like Borisoglebsk-2, Zhitel, and Pole stations may not appear particularly menacing, lacking guns or striking missile systems, but they pose a significant challenge to Ukraine’s defense.

These electronic warfare systems, despite not being the latest models, are evolving rapidly in terms of their tactical usage. On the contemporary battlefield, they hold immense importance and frequently cause operational delays for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

Cherevaty underscored the urgency for Ukraine to bolster the pillars of electronic warfare. On a brighter note, Ukraine boasts of a competent training institute for this specialty. Clearly, the significance of electronic warfare systems is well acknowledged.

Electronic warfare systems, or electromagnetic warfare systems, survey diverse radio frequencies emitted by weapon systems integrated with electronics. These weapons are the epitome of modern warfare. Additionally, these systems can perform jamming operations that can incapacitate aircraft, missiles, or communication equipment.

For instance, these systems can sever the link between a drone and its controller. This doesn’t require large weapons – compact electronic anti-drone weapons do the job. Larger electronic warfare systems monitor enemy communications over expansive distances and can jam them. They can interfere with navigation systems, radars, and other devices.

Cherevaty emphasized how this war compels constant learning and enhancement. As technology advances, warfare in Ukraine is unique due to the diverse range of weapons deployed, including small drones that are frequently targeted by electronic warfare weapons.

“The enemy wields powerful electronic warfare. We will redouble our efforts in this area. Sadly, the enemy is doing the same. Just yesterday, we obliterated another one of their electronic warfare stations. Such stations are high on our target list. We’re always seeking and destroying enemy stations like Borisoglebsk, Zhitel, and Pole,” Cherevaty said.

He also pointed out that electronic warfare systems are a potent weapon against the Russian Lancet drones that routinely target Ukrainian military equipment.

Russian Borisoglebsk-2, Zhitel, and Pole EW stations are electronic warfare [EW] systems used by the Russian military to disrupt or disable enemy communications and radar systems.

Borisoglebsk-2 is a mobile EW system that can detect and jam radar signals, as well as disrupt communication systems. Zhitel is a ground-based EW system that can jam radio and satellite communications, as well as disrupt GPS signals. Pole is a portable EW system that can be carried by soldiers and used to disrupt enemy communications and radar systems.

Comparing the Borisoglebsk-2, Zhitel, and Pole EW stations is not a straightforward task, as each of them has its own strengths and weaknesses. However, based on certain criteria, one can argue that the Borisoglebsk-2 station is the best among the three. For instance, the Borisoglebsk-2 station has a longer range than the other two, which means it can detect and jam enemy radars from a greater distance.

Additionally, the Borisoglebsk-2 station has a higher power output, which makes it more effective in jamming enemy radars. These factors make the Borisoglebsk-2 station a more powerful and reliable option than the other two stations.

Another factor that makes the Borisoglebsk-2 station stand out is its versatility. The station can be used in different modes, such as spot jamming, barrage jamming, and deception jamming. This means that the Borisoglebsk-2 station can adapt to different situations and effectively counter different types of threats.

In contrast, the Zhitel and Pole EW stations have more limited capabilities and are designed for specific purposes. Therefore, the Borisoglebsk-2 station can be considered the best option for a wide range of scenarios.

Warfare [EW] systems can be detected on the battlefield through a variety of methods. One of the most common methods is through the use of electronic support measures [ESM] equipment. ESM equipment is designed to detect and locate the source of electromagnetic emissions, such as those produced by EW systems. This can provide valuable information to military commanders about the location and capabilities of enemy EW systems.

Another method for detecting EW systems is through the use of radar. Radar can be used to detect the presence of electronic signals, which can then be analyzed to determine if they are coming from an EW system. This method is particularly useful for detecting jamming signals, which are often used by EW systems to disrupt or disable enemy communications and radar systems.

In addition to ESM equipment and radar, visual observation can also be used to detect EW systems on the battlefield. This method is particularly useful for detecting physical EW systems, such as jammers or decoys, which may be visible to the naked eye. However, visual observation can be difficult in combat situations, and may not always be reliable.

Finally, it is important to note that the detection of EW systems on the battlefield is not always a straightforward process. EW systems are designed to be difficult to detect and can employ a variety of techniques to evade detection. As a result, military forces must be constantly vigilant and employ a range of detection methods to ensure that they are aware of the presence and capabilities of enemy EW systems.

***

Follow us everywhere and at any time. BulgarianMilitary.com has responsive design and you can open the page from any computer, mobile devices or web browsers. For more up-to-date news, follow our Google News, YouTube, Reddit, LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook pages. Our standards: Manifesto & ethical principles.